Interesting Documents:

The Anti-Government Movement Guidebook
This document developed by the government for what they term "anti government" movements.  It has some classic absurdities in it from both the government and the "movement's" perspective.  For example the authors on page 24 under the title "The Posse and the Common Law" state: "The term "common law" is itself common, but most people do not know exactly what it means. Its meaning, though, is pretty simple: it refers to unwritten, judge-made law (as opposed to written or statutory law)."  Clearly judges have no authority to make law in the U.S., that is the explicit function of the Legislature and the judicial branch is explicitly not authorized to make law, however, not according to this document funded with the people's money.   How the Judiciary is attempting to deceive true law is they are taking the concept of Precedence under Common Law and implying that that give judges the right to make law.  This could not be further from the truth.  Precedence under common law implies to the "will of the people" and not the whim of a judge.  One could say that the outcome of a trial by jury reflects the will of the people, however, there are no longer any trials by jury in State courts since the judges determine what evidence goes before the jury and thus influence the outcome of the trial making it a trial by judge and jury and not a trial by jury.

Perhaps more explicit examples of how the judiciary has completely corrupted the system is their claim now that many matters, including all "family law" is to be tried in a "court of equity".  They lead the lawyers and parties to believe that they do not have their seventh amendment right to a trial by jury.  However, Section 16 of the 1789 Federal Judiciary Act which is still in force states "And be it further enacted, That suits in equity shall not be sustained in either of the courts of the United States, in any case where plain, adequate and complete remedy may be had at law."  I.e. you cannot be forced into a court of equity where there is a remedy at law!  Courts of equity are for cases where there is no remedy because, for example the parties are dead.

Another astonishing element of the current incorporated courts is that they imply that the "Code" is law.   For any legislative committee's suggestions of law to become law, two thirds of the legislature needs to vote to enact the law.  The Code has never been ratified and is in fact largely anti-law since Common Law is explicitly not a 'code based system'.  Only one state in the U.S. has an underlying legal code system, that is Louisiana where the Napoleonic Code forms their underlying law.  The "Code" in other states holds as much lawful authority as a "code of ethics" and clearly this judiciary has no ethics.

Current Courts which all hold Dun & Bradstreet numbers and are run like corporations bent on increasing revenue from fines etc., insist on the completely fraudulent and false claim that only the Judiciary has a right to judge the law.  The Judiciary claims that juries only have a right to judge the facts and that judging the law is the exclusive domain of the judiciary.  Consider what Samuel Chase, Supreme Court Justice and signer of the Declaration of Independence said in 1804: "The jury has the right to judge both the law and the facts". The 1849 California Constitution went on to put this in Article I. Declaration of Rights. Sec. 9. "Every citizen may freely speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right; and no law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press. In all criminal prosecutions on indictments for libels, the truth may be given in evidence to the jury; and if it shall appear to the jury that the matter charged as libellous is true, and was published with good motives and for justifiable ends, the party shall be acquitted; and the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the fact."

This "Anti Government, Government Handbook" must be studied so as to understand the judiciary's attempts to defraud justice, it must also be studied so as to understand what some of the clearly foolish arguments are that are being brought before the court by pro-se litigants.

Clearly criminals acting under the color of law with so-called judicially blessed 'sovereign immunity' are seriously concerned that Courts will form in the U.S. that follow the law and hold them accountable for their crimes.

One factor to consider to drive the fact home regarding the formation of courts is the Grand Jury.  There is never any judge involved in presiding over a Grand Jury, neither are there meant to be any government officials. 

Public Prosecutors were invented well after the nation and courts were formed.  The government is not a real party of interest, and it is not a real person, and therefore the government cannot file verified criminal complaint.  However, the courts have assumed all responsibilities to file complaints and prosecute the public completely outside of any lawful authority.  As a consequence the U.S. has more people incarcerated than all the other nations of the world combined!  This statistic alone is sufficient to fire every judge, prosecutor, clerk and any person who has anything to do with these criminals who run the courts in the U.S.